In an alarming turn of events, the Supreme Court of Canada has removed the mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of child luring, effectively placing the rights of the perpetrator above those of their victims
The Supreme Court has officially ended any hope of appeal, refusing to hear from several church leaders issued fines worth hundreds of thousands of dollars for opposing provincial mandates, stating “it is not a matter of national public interest to pursue.”
You may recall a recent post we released about a woman who has been repeatedly denied a lifesaving transplant because she does not feel that the Covid-19 vaccine is safe, and worries it may impact her already-precarious health to the extent that she will not be fit for her much-needed transplant.
A US hospital has reached out and agreed to provide her the treatment and transplant she needs to live. We couldn’t be happier for her however, as with all medical procedures in the US system, it comes with a significant cost.
Of the many tragedies still unfolding under the repercussions of Covid policies, one particularly heartbreaking case is that of Ms. Sheila Lewis, denied a lifesaving transplant for refusing the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’.
Ms. Lewis has challenged the constitutionality of Covid-19 vaccines for transplant patients and in a final effort, she petitioned the Supreme Court of Canada, to no avail.
The Supreme Court of Canada has made a decision to strike down a 2011 federal law that made it possible to extend parole ineligibility for those convicted of multiple murders. This decision is binding and must now be applied to all sentences, as in the case of Justin Bourque.
Bourque plead guilty to 3 counts of first-degree murder and 2 counts of attempted murder for targeting RCMP officers in June of 2014 and was subsequently handed a sentence of life in prison.