Attorney General Loses Court Ruling Regarding Evidence Related to Invoking the Emergencies Act

2023-02-14

Attorney General Loses Court Ruling Regarding Evidence Related to Invoking the Emergencies Act

Feb 14, 2023 | Blog, General News | 2 comments

Attorney General Loses Court Ruling Regarding Evidence Related to Invoking the Emergencies Act

 
 
 

The Western Standard recently reported that the federal court overseeing the inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act has ordered the disclosure of internal emails between the liberal cabinet.

Justice Mosley ruled that these emails are pertinent to the inquiry and have not been provided despite repeated requests. The Department of Justice has argued for the liberal government claiming cabinet confidentiality.

The government has made repeated claims that police asked for additional authorities citing national security threats and radical political ideologies. Such statements are all too familiar and have been uttered by the Prime Minister himself.

In fact, the involved police agencies have testified that there was no evidence to substantiate these claims and that they did not request the use of the act.

This is a favourable ruling for transparency and accountability. It is in the public interest that all the evidence is brought forth as the government acted in a way that seriously infringed on our guaranteed Charter rights and the ability to peacefully protest.

Section 52(1) of the Charter states that “The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.”

Additionally, section 24(1) states “Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.”

The federal government is required to meet a certain threshold to invoke the act. Should this inquiry determine that those parameters were not met any citizen who had their rights infringed on by the state may apply to the court for remedy.

To read the Western Standard article written by Matthew Harwood, click here 

2 Comments

  1. humanityfirst

    Specifically, what is a “court remedy” and how do I apply for a court remedy ? Our b@stard PM’s mandates, public death threat, and relentless hate speech went after my children like a predator and has done irreparable harm to my family. —>”Should this inquiry determine that those parameters were not met any citizen who had their rights infringed on by the state may apply to the court for remedy”

  2. chattingkat

    How can this unvetted pedo that had sexual relations with a 12 year old when he was a teacher at West Point Grey be a PM of a country. He was illegally elected 3 times with foreign influencing and foreign funding. WEF made sure this clown that can’t think for himself was primed and groomed for this position! Our corrupt Canadian legal system, corrupt complete police system (Brenda Lucki one of the corrupt stepping down), our corrupt government provincial, municipal system, our corrupt school system all need an overhaul. Canadians need to fight back and make sure our hard earned money is not said lost and then pocketed by the politicians. The turd was worth $10 million 2015, he is now worth $110 million after his complete f*ck up of Covid and dirty dealings. Yet he commits all these crimes against humanity and Canadian people and is above the law? WHAT A F*CKING JOKE! PROUD TO BE CANADIAN, ASHAMED AND EMBARRASSED OF MY GOVERNMENT!

HIGHLIGHTS

Mother Challenges School Division to Implement Washroom Policies Protecting Female Students’ Privacy and Safety

A Saskatchewan Mother is stepping up to champion the rights of girls in school washrooms, rights of privacy, security and dignity that our government is systematically and intentionally stripping away.

Bill C-22: Nothing Says Freedom Like Expanded Surveillance

Bill C-22: Nothing Says Freedom Like Expanded Surveillance

Bill C-22, The Lawful Access Act, is the Canadian Liberal government’s newest and most egregious effort to strip the rights and freedoms from it’s citizens, enforcing increasing surveillance and control.

Ontario Superior Court Judge Criticizes Court System’s Preference for Foreign Offenders

Ontario Superior Court Judge Criticizes Court System’s Preference for Foreign Offenders

In a recent ruling, Ontario Superior Court Justice Antonio Skarica has exposed what we have all been witnessing; how our justice system routinely applies different rules for foreign offenders while law-abiding Canadians pay the price.

Tamara Lich Launches Legal Action Against Ottawa Police Service and the Crown Over Malicious Prosecution

Tamara Lich Launches Legal Action Against Ottawa Police Service and the Crown Over Malicious Prosecution

After suffering the longest and most aggressively prosecuted mischief trial in Canadian history, Tamara Lich is now suing the police and Crown for malicious prosecution and negligent investigation.

Recent News