JCCF Announces Courts Dismissed Judicial Review Application for Lawsuit Regarding Quarantine Hotels

2023-02-02

JCCF Announces Courts Dismissed Judicial Review Application for Lawsuit Regarding Quarantine Hotels

Feb 2, 2023 | Blog, General News

JCCF Announces Courts Dismissed Judicial Review Application for Lawsuit Regarding Quarantine Hotels

 
 
 

Once again, we see the timely suspension of federal mandates provide the excuse of ‘muteness’ for courts to refuse to hear lawsuits aimed at addressing government overreach; with mandates no longer being enforced, the argument is deemed ‘mute’ in that there is no longer a ‘live controversy’ between parties.

A recent example reported by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms outlines the Federal Court of Appeal supports of the Supreme Court decision to dismiss lawsuits requesting judicial review of federal mandates that forced Canadians into quarantine hotels, against their will and at their own cost.

The government understood there was little expectation quarantines would control the spread of an already ubiquitous virus. This mandate, like so many others, was clearly a political and vindictive action aimed at Canadians.

The concept that we should dismiss a wrongdoing that has already happened because the chance of it happening again has lessened, is absurd. This supports the government’s ability to get away with anything, if they withdraw (suspend) the offending action before it makes its way through the court process. It is this strategy that provides officials with a clear-cut way out, knowing they will never have to answer for the gross overreach. The court could have chosen to hear the appeal as a matter of public interest, despite of the lack of a live controversy between parties.

JCCF summarized their disappointment: this “permits government actions that severely violated Canadians’ Charter rights to go unaddressed simply because of the passage of time” and allows “governments to continue with future unprecedented and draconian measures without judicial checks and balances”, “preventing them from being properly adjudicated through the court system”.

Our Charter exists to define the obligatory rights of individuals and provide a means of standing against potential tyranny in government. Police on Guard continues to defend the rule of law and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms for all. We cannot stand by and watch the continued destruction of our country.

To read the article written by the JCCF, click here 

0 Comments

HIGHLIGHTS

Air Canada Ordered to Compensate Seven Pilots After Rejection of Religious COVID-19 Vaccine Exemptions

Air Canada Ordered to Compensate Seven Pilots After Rejection of Religious COVID-19 Vaccine Exemptions

In the ongoing fight for individual rights and freedoms in Canada, a recent decision from Arbitrator James Hayes has supported the individual rights of the Air Canada pilots placed on unpaid leave, after their religious exemptions to the Covid-19 vaccination policy were denied.

Judge: COVID Shutdown of Adamson Barbeque isn't a 'Seizure,' Charter Challenge Thrown Out

Judge: COVID Shutdown of Adamson Barbeque isn’t a ‘Seizure,’ Charter Challenge Thrown Out

Ontario Superior Court Justice Janet Leiper’s March 20th ruling dismissing Adam Skelly’s Charter challenge, has dealt a blow to individual rights.

BC Appeals Court Reverses Decision That Sided With Union Against Purolator Vaccine Mandates

BC Appeals Court Reverses Decision That Sided With Union Against Purolator Vaccine Mandates

British Columbia’s Court of Appeal has overturned a victory favouring union workers who challenged Purolator’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate, prioritizing employer rights over individual rights and bodily autonomy.

Federal Government Appeals Emergencies Act Ruling to Supreme Court of Canada

Federal Government Appeals Emergencies Act Ruling to Supreme Court of Canada

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the federal government waited until the last possible moment to appeal the Emergencies Act d

Recent News