Transport Canada’s travel mandates were implemented to increase uptake of vaccinations

2022-08-18

Transport Canada’s travel mandates were implemented to increase uptake of vaccinations

Aug 18, 2022 | Blog, General News | 1 comment

Transport Canada's travel mandates were implemented to increase uptake of vaccinations

 

 

Transport Canada documents recently released clearly reveal the intention behind travel restrictions for unvaccinated Canadians as purely one of pressure to increase vaccine uptake, and not to combat any valid medical risks associated with the travel sector.

In a brief prepared in November 2020 titled “Risk of COVID-19 Transmission Aboard Aircraft,” the department confirms that “the risk of spread of COVID-19 amongst passengers while traveling aboard aircraft appears to be low” citing an October 2020 press release from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) which stated a 1 in 27 million rate of flight-related transmission.

Despite this, a memorandum signed by Transportation Minister Alghabra in October 2021, stated the desired ‘indirect benefit’ of the mandates as one that “should act as a catalyst to increase Canada’s overall vaccination rate.” while discussing the challenge posed by the remaining eligible Canadians who are still not fully vaccinated. This coming weeks after they were already aware of the above noted risks of 1:27 million.

These vaccine mandates, both for travel and employment, along with the vaccine passports, are seen as a success in driving vaccine uptake by public health officials, regardless of their previous admissions that vaccinating does not stop transmission. As stated by Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam in February, when speaking of the increase in vaccination uptake post-mandate, “There’s now obvious evidence that they (mandates) work”.

Several lawsuits have emerged that argue against these mandates. The Attorney General is attempting to have these thrown out citing the suspension of mandates June 20th, while ignoring the comments by the Liberal government stating that they may be reinstated at any time, at their discretion. That said, the issue is clearly not resolved until the legality of these mandates are addressed in their entirety, once and for all.

How many Canadians have felt coerced to get vaccinated because of visiting their loved ones, keeping their hard-earned jobs, supporting their families, or simply maintaining the freedom to travel that they had enjoyed before? And when they are injured or suffer side effects they are ignored and provided with no recourse or compensation.

Freedom of travel is the right of all Canadians and legal residents. Vaccination is a choice and informed consent is a legal requirement. It always has been and must remain so.

To read the The Epoch Times Article written by Noé Chartier, click here 

1 Comment

  1. juliteor

    my 27-year-old nephew suffered a stroke 20 days after receiving the booster, he died, autopsy says they found blood clots. My father died 20 days after my nephew died and they did not allow me to fly to be with my family at that painful moment. It’s been 7 months since my tragedy and they still don’t allow me to travel because I didn’t take the genetic experiment and they demand an application (arrive canada) which I don’t accept the terms 😢😢😡.

HIGHLIGHTS

Bill C-22: Nothing Says Freedom Like Expanded Surveillance

Bill C-22: Nothing Says Freedom Like Expanded Surveillance

Bill C-22, The Lawful Access Act, is the Canadian Liberal government’s newest and most egregious effort to strip the rights and freedoms from it’s citizens, enforcing increasing surveillance and control.

Ontario Superior Court Judge Criticizes Court System’s Preference for Foreign Offenders

Ontario Superior Court Judge Criticizes Court System’s Preference for Foreign Offenders

In a recent ruling, Ontario Superior Court Justice Antonio Skarica has exposed what we have all been witnessing; how our justice system routinely applies different rules for foreign offenders while law-abiding Canadians pay the price.

Tamara Lich Launches Legal Action Against Ottawa Police Service and the Crown Over Malicious Prosecution

Tamara Lich Launches Legal Action Against Ottawa Police Service and the Crown Over Malicious Prosecution

After suffering the longest and most aggressively prosecuted mischief trial in Canadian history, Tamara Lich is now suing the police and Crown for malicious prosecution and negligent investigation.

Support Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police Service at Her Upcoming Sentencing Hearing on May 19th-21st

Support Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police Service at Her Upcoming Sentencing Hearing on May 19th-21st

Support Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police Service at Her Upcoming Sentencing Hearing on May 19th-21st

Recent News