Adam Skelly, Owner of Adamson BBQ Ordered to Prepay $32,000, In Case of Loss, To Have His Case Heard
Adam Skelly, the owner of Adamson BBQ, was the first to publicly stand against the mandates for those wishing to enjoy his restaurant. For that he paid dearly, starting with harassment by authorities and ending with his arrest, criminal charges laid against him and the additional threat of a significant lawsuit by the City of Toronto.
Adam has been granted a court date, set for October of 2024, to challenge the validity of the Reopening Ontario Act, Lockdown Regulation 82/20 and the authority of the Toronto Medical Officer of Health on legal and constitutional grounds.
The Crown has insisted that this challenge is frivolous, successfully arguing for a motion of security against him. If Adam is successful in his challenge, the Crown has agreed to drop the criminal charges and lawsuit. However, the motion of security means that he is now required to put up the funds for the case in advance to cover costs in the event of a loss.
Adam has been given a deadline of January 10th to raise $32k to meet the stipulations of this motion. If he is unsuccessful, his case will be forfeited and the charges of trespassing and mischief under $5,000, as well as the pending lawsuit by the City of Toronto, in the amount of $187k for police services during the protest, will proceed against him.
There are two fundraisers set for New Year’s Eve to support Adam in his challenge; one is being held in Windsor and the other in Toronto. There is a also GiveSendGo account set up for him that can be accessed with this link: https://www.givesendgo.com/bbq_rebellion.
The government of Ontario needs to be held accountable for their actions that so grievously affected so many Canadian businesses and individuals.
Please stand with us and support Adam’s lawsuit. Time is short and he needs our help!
Guys- this is not complicated. First principles are where to look for the answer. Consider:
1. Bank of Canada issued paper is nothing more than a promissory *NOTE* as defined on the instruments themselves. Hidden in plain sight, in tiny, weenie, small print find the words “this *note* is legal tender”. HIDDEN FOR GOOD REASON…… THIS IS THEIR ACHILLES HEAL.
2. Under the Bills of Exchange Act at interpretation the word *Note* is defined as a promissory note.
3. A promissory note is a promise to pay, (NOT PAYMENT) and a promise to pay later is incapable of being payment now outside of the legal framework of tender and what is legal (colour of law) is not lawful without your consent, tacit or otherwise. When we don’t say ‘no’ the court assumes we say yes/consent to proceed.
4. A debt plus a promise to pay the debt equals 2X debt.
5. Bank of Canada promises to pay are no different than you promising to pay on paper.
6. Bank of Canada notes are backed by security. That surety is the collective creative energy and possessions of we the people taken for consideration recognized in a Security Certificate (social benefit) first issued when we are born called BIRTH CERTIFICATE. The registration and certified *berth* of the body vessel creates jurisdiction for mafia run government citizen SHIP that overrides your natural rights where Captain Trudeau’s word is law. Your body vessel may need to be BAILED OUT. See, sea, water, maritime, Admiralty juris-diction. Juris = control and diction is the words that are used to define jurisdiction.
7. Promise to pay WHAT???? We have no money in Canada, *only promises to pay* money? PAY WHAT? Say what? What money?
8. Again, under the Bills of Exchange Act (legal), where the person upon whom a charge (instrument) is drawn is an artificial person or a person not having the capacity to contract, the holder of the instrument may treat it either as a bill or a note. Now the court’s $32,000 fine is drawn on a fictitious person identified by the (BIRTH CERTIFICATE ALL CAPS NAME), ADAM SKELLY and not Adam Skelly) and therefor Adam (holder) has the option to treat the charging instrument either as a bill to be paid or a promise from the Receiver General to pay him $32,000. In other words, the court is asking for a loan and that loan can be paid by way of a signature using set off to zero the account when using the proper technique.
9. Know who you are relative to the FICTITIOUS PERSON that is named on the charging document identified in ALL CAPITALIZED LETTERING STYLE. The ALL CAPS name charges the surety (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) that they created and therefor hold control over. A fictitious person(Mickey Mouse, CROWN, Donald Duck) is a created entity that has no standing OVER a natural person/creator. A created entity does not stand over a creator of entities. Sooooo….. they name the BIRTH CERTIFICATE FICTION in a construct of fraud contrary 322(1) theft by conversion under the Criminal Code.
10. Doctrine of law: He who creates also controls and We are responsible for what we create.
11. The CHARTER is simply a corporate charter that applies to the employees of the corporation. It was first issued to the Hudson’s Bay Company which was later bought by the Dominion of Canada Company now called Canada. All corporations derive from the Satanic cult of the dead in Babylonian times where (corpses) were used in order to avoid personal liability for wrong doing which caused harm.
11. Statutory law operates in the jurisdiction of the water, maritime law called Admiralty. This is contract law and your consent is a requirement for it to operate against you.
12. Juris-diction (control) is key. Know that you are the primary creditor and holder of first equity. All public charges including taxes and fines can be discharged via set off against your credit if properly done with a signature. This is how we zero the public account and stop the growth of the so called public debt. Our own ignorance of the law is what binds us. Knowledge is power. We do not have to take back our power….. we need only realize how powerful we are as made in the image of the Creator….. we are creators.
We are God’s because we are GOD. Nothing is not GOD. Out of the gate, the Charter recognizes the supremacy of GOD.
13. If you would like assistance to comprehend this first principle contact me for an interview. This is a very brief outline in law and not legal add-vice.
jack ronald – heilman
captainjack@sasktel.net
Fantastic summary above! I was going to write the same idea but this one is the boss.
The fine is issued by a corporation to an employee. Is Adam their employee? If so, where’s the signed contract between them?