$500 Million Lawsuit Launched Against Military for Vaccine Mandates Dismissed by Federal Court
The case brought forward by Valour Legal, on behalf of the hundreds of Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members whose health, safety and Charter Rights were ignored in favour of vaccine mandates imposed throughout our armed forces, has been dismissed on procedural grounds by Judge Catherine A. Coughlan.
Her ruling was focused entirely on critiquing the documentation of the claim, ignoring the substance and the very real concerns put forward by the plaintiffs.
The ruling heavily criticized the length and content of the documents filed while reinforcing existing internal grievance processes within the CAF. Valour Legal has highlighted some of the key takeaways of the ruling:
The ruling described the plaintiffs’ statement of claim as vague, speculative, and filled with unsupported allegations, finding that it lacked material facts and failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action.
Allegations of breaches to individual rights afforded by our Charter were deemed insufficient, pointing to a lack of detailed facts supporting claims related to freedom of religion, life, liberty, and security, as well as equality rights.
Claims against public officials for misfeasance related to vaccine mandates were dismissed due to a lack of evidence.
The ruling supported the internal statutory grievance mechanisms available to CAF members, pointing to the successful application of this system by over 100 plaintiffs.
Her ruling has attempted to shield the government from prosecution. This is a trend we have seen all-to-frequently in recent years – delaying or dismissing cases that threaten the narratives of our government officials. Forcing cases back to internal grievance processes, knowing full well that those systems are clearly broken or heavily biased. And, ignoring the rights of the individual in favour of shielding the decision-makers at all costs.
Political affiliations have no place in our justice system. Neither does anyone who sees fit to protect the corrupt policies of government, at the cost of its citizens.
Please stand with us as we support their efforts to appeal. Canadians deserve a just ruling on the damages caused by these unlawful mandates.
Yes…in regard to our BROKEN LIBERAL COURTS, I saw this story today also;
WATCH: https://www.westernstandard.news/news/watch-vaccine-choice-canada-president-explains-why-group-dropped-mandates-lawsuit/60817
Vaccine Choice Canada (VCC) dropped mandates lawsuit…Published: 31 Dec 2024
VCC dropped COVID-19era mandate lawsuit against the Government of Canada due to unobtainable expenses and corrupt courts.
President Ted Kuntz appeared on Dr. Mark Trozzi’s podcast this week, where he detailed the nonprofit organization’s legal challenge to “unlawful and egregious” COVID-19 mandates, launched against the Trudeau Liberal government and the Ontario government in July 2020.
VCC decided earlier this year to withdraw the case “because [they] have zero confidence in our legal system,” said Kuntz, adding “they have demonstrated over and over again that they have no interest in upholding our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”