Mission Statement of Police on Guard for Thee
We began as a group of active and retired Police Officers whose mission remains:
To honour our Oath to uphold the Constitution of Canada and, to the best of our abilities, preserve the peace, prevent offenses and to discharge other duties as Police Officers faithfully, impartially, and according to law.
To continue to serve and protect the public while remaining independent of political influence.
To repair and regain public trust being damaged or lost due to the enforcement of emergency measures. We believe these measures not only conflict with our Charter Oath but place active duty police officers in an untenable position when directed to enforce these measures.
As our membership grows, we stand now with our active and retired brothers and sisters within the Military, Law Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency, Correctional Services and Fire Fighters with a mission:
To honour our individual oaths in support of our great country and our commitment of service to its citizens. We uphold our duty of loyalty to the Charter and maintain respect for the rights of all.
Together we stand:
To encourage our active and retired members to join in our court actions requesting clarification on the validity of the measures passed by our Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments.
And finally, to maintain a lawful, peaceful and respectful environment as we move forward in the challenges outlined above.
Recent News
Police on Guard’s 3rd Year Anniversary
These last 3 years has brought many changes to the lives of Canadians. Seeing our governments act in ways that outright ignore the foundations of law, has brought many brave police officers out of their comfort zones to stand for the oaths they swore to uphold. This is how Police On Guard was born.
We were joined in our mission by members of the Military, Canada Border Services Agency, Correctional Services and Fire Fighters
Happy 3rd Anniversary from your Police On Guard Family
$6250 Quarantine Act Ticket Received 16 Months After Breaking “Quarantine Rules”
Jacob Malcer of Quebec received a ticket in August 2023 for an apparent violation of the Quarantine Act from 16 months prior, in May 2022.
Fast-forward to August 2023. Malcer received a letter from the government of Quebec accusing him of having violated the Quarantine Act. He was given a $5,000 fine in addition to $1,250 in “costs.”
Adam Skelly, Owner of Adamson BBQ Ordered to Prepay $32,000, In Case of Loss, To Have His Case Heard
Adam Skelly, the owner of Adamson BBQ, was the first to publicly stand against the mandates for those wishing to enjoy his restaurant. For that he paid dearly, starting with harassment by authorities and ending with his arrest, criminal charges laid against him and the additional threat of a significant lawsuit by the City of Toronto.
Read the article to learn more on how you can support Adam.
Waterloo Ontario, the Latest City to Implement Bylaws to “Prohibit Offending People” on Public Property
Communities across Canada are adopting bylaws aimed at restricting free speech deemed ‘offensive’ or ‘harassing’.
London, Edmonton, Calgary and now Waterloo, have all implemented bylaws targeting freedom of expression with a goal of labelling speech as hateful, racist or discriminatory.
Judge Rickcola Brinton Suing Province of Nova Scotia & Another Judge Over Covid Vaccination Status
Judge Rickcola Brinton has filed a lawsuit with the Nova Scotia Supreme Court for damages resulting from ‘violations of the principles of judicial independence and impartiality’ as well as ‘violations of her medical privacy’, in relation to her vaccination status.
British Columbia Court of Appeal Agrees Case Regarding Vaccine Passports Should Be Heard
Last year we heard the ruling of Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson in British Columbia that dismissed a case brought forward by the Canadian Constitution Federation (CCF) on behalf of the three individuals who claim they were harmed by the vaccine passport program.
The decision was appealed and the British Columbia Court of Appeal has agreed the case should be heard.





